Monday 27 April 2015

Introducing myself to Philosophy-I

 

Philosophy has always been part of human being. It is philosophy or elements of philosophy that made human being evolve as human being from her ancestor (if we were to believe theory of evolution). In early period man would have philosophies things related directly to feeding stomach and survival. But, as civilization flourish and more leisure and free time are available men begin to philosophies regarding various dimension. More abstract and imaginary philosophy begins. Comparing to its existence the name ‘philosophy’ and ‘Greek philosophy’ could be a late development. But surely it was Greek philosophy which has shape the modern contemporary philosophy in great detail.
With the birth of every child a new philosopher is born unto this Earth. Like the historic progress of philosophy, I have evolve through different phase. I was ignorant of the study of philosophy though I might have applied in various part of my daily life. In my childhood I keep wondering if this world is a little landscape stuck in upper parts of giant sleeping snake. Which would make our Earth parish as the snake wake up and moves its way. I also grew wondering that somewhere in the corner of this world someone exactly looking like me and with same name might be living. As I went for hunting with my father a bird narrowly escape with injury from my father’s target. Up above me fly away the bird and that point of time I was thinking that all those birds or animal injured would meet up in a particular place on this world to recover and heal themselves. In my early elementary education I grew up as an orthodox believer that scientist knew everything and are equivalent to God. Now I wonder but in clueless where all those concepts or believes are form in my mind. Have I been wondering about the place where we live, wondering for the meaning of its existence or about the uniqueness or commonality of an individual?
Lately, as my profession encounter the ‘philosophy of education’ I begin to ponder upon the systematic study of philosophy. In the beginning I was overwhelm by the literal meaning of philosophy ‘the love of wisdom’ derive from Greek word “philosophia”. Because my idea of wisdom initially comes from the notion of wisdom in religious text (The Bible). Which means something like the endowment form God to man for obeying Him or younger ones obeying to elders. Something of supernatural or miraculous acts, words or thoughts.  But, this confusion still hardly cease even now for I hardly came across the term used in the systematic study of philosophy. I hope moving on I will be able to clear up this cloud of confusion. Reading the history of philosophers seems to confluence with philosophy. Initially I find it quite awkward but now I find more reasons why it is impossible to divide philosophy and philosophers.
 Before classifying or dissecting the components of philosophy I would like to deal with some general definition of philosophy as well. Some defined philosophy as the pursuit of truth like any other pursue or science. Philosophy is also defined as an activity of working out the right ways of thinking about things. Which makes philosophy a second order activity. I think the idea that philosophy is totally a mind activity is also exaggerated, knowing something (branch of philosophy-epistemology) is possible due to our capacity to receive representation by our senses. This gives us an object which makes possible mind activity to think about the object. Philosophy in contemporary may range from arm chair activity to argument to some complex integrated experiment example Milgram test.  One may come across good philosophy, bad philosophy and non-philosophy which are name on the basis of the road they took in their course. On the other hand some find it meaningless to question what philosophy is. There is nothing philosophical in asking the question. Or will gain any philosophical understanding by answering it. Philosophy is what philosopher do. Let, me try to explain this with an analogy. When someone asked who Guru Prasad Sharma is? I think we will begin by explaining what he is doing, where he belong to, what are admirable qualities about him etc. etc. obviously not by explaining the literal meaning of what Guru, Prasad and Sharma stands for. If I tried to explain the meaning of Guru translated as teacher then it may begin to dissociate from the person himself. For he may not have been a teacher in his life. Therefore, it could be rightly said that philosophy means what philosopher do.

These are some of my dilemma and wonders when it comes to the topic of philosophy. In the next write-up I will go further to explore inquires dissecting the components of philosophy and in particular ‘epistemology’.